User talk:Cepesko
Bildupload
Hallo, ich finde es toll, dass du dich so aktiv um die Wanderwegsymbole kümmerst. Bitte achte darauf, dass du immer eine gültige Lizens zu deinen Uploads an gibst. Bsp.: File:34px-Symbol RP nsp fuchs sw.png
Ich denke, dass es anderen Usern eine Hilfe wäre, wenn du deine Uploads Kategorisieren würdest. vgl. Category:Trail markings. Füge in der Bildbeschreibung deiner Bilder einfach [[Category:Alpha-Numeric Trail markings]] oder [[Category:Plant Trail markings]] etc ein. Bsp.: File:600px-Symbol_spb_bs_B2.png Danke und Gruß René aus Mainz --Reneman (talk) 18:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Edit: Wie erstellst du die Dateien? Hast du diese als svg? Dann könntest du statt png die svg-Version hoch laden...
- siehe auch:
- w:meta:SVG_image_support (wikimedia.org)
- w:commons:Commons:Wechsel zu SVG (commons.wikimedia.org)
- --Reneman (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo! Könntest Du bitte bei 200px_Spessart_NW_orange.svg noch die Lizenz-Angabe ergänzen? Danke und Gruß, Chris2map (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Einbinden von Dateien
Danke für deine Tips für das Laden von Bildern, auch das Katalogisieren macht großen Sinn. Alle Bilder wurden über inkscape erstellt. Das Format habe ich dem angepasst, was ich an Formaten vorfand. Wenn svg statt png besser ist, kann ich problemlos das Ausgabeformat ändern. Werde mich dazu einlesen, auch wenn das Wochenende vorbei ist....Danke für die Support-Links.
Habe, da bisher wenig uploads getätigt, noch großen Informationsbedarf, was das Arbeiten in der Wiki angeht. Die Wiki ist diesbezüglich auch etwas kompliziert zu bedienen. (Auch diese Diskussionsseite war mir bisher fremd ... wie du an den fehlenden Postings bei mir erkennst.
Die Info zum Copyright hae ich mittlerweile verstanden. Werde mal die anderern hochgeladenen Dateien anschauen (wo ich die Angabe nicht vergessen hatte). Eine weitere Beispieldatei hat du ja genannt.
Gruß, Cepesko
- Dann muss ich jetzt den folgenden Link auch noch ergänzen: DE:Wiki Help :o) --Reneman (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nachträglich herzlich Willkommen. Auf Diskussionsseiten werden Beiträge immer signiert, benutze dafür das Symbol mit dem Stift, diese setzt
--~~~~was beim speichern automatisch durch Usernamen mit Link und Datum/Uhrzeit ersetzt wird. Viel Erfolg, Rückfragen gerne :) --Reneman (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC) - Da die Wikisyntax überall fast gleich ist, kannst du auch die Wikipedia-Hilfe benutzen, diese ist auf deutsch und sehr ausführlich :) w:de:Hilfe:Bearbeitungshilfe --Reneman (talk) 20:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Alle in diesem Wiki zur Verfügung stehenden Lizensvorlagen findest du hier: Category:Media license templates --Reneman (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Kulturweg Spessartrampe.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Cepesko}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Attribution
Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.
You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.
Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.
Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.
Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.
If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}
For your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc
For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way.
Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution
For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}
