User talk:Geozeisig

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Filing cabinet icon.svg Archiv

Is it needed/authorship?

Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Leaftype_unknown.png useful or needed for something?

It is no longer needed, we use File:Landuse-forest.png.
Thanks!

Also, are you author of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Example_turn_lanes_forward.jpg and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Example_turn_lanes.jpg files?

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

They are used on [1]--geozeisig (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
I know - and I wanted to ask "are you author" (and if yes: to ask for explicit licensing it as {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} or {{CC0-self}}) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

PD

re https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=File:Example_turn_lanes.jpg&curid=136533&diff=2285982&oldid=2283399

"releasing work to public domain" has some issues, as it is not well defined in some jurisdictions and/or it is not actually possible to "release to public domain". Using CC0 license avoids this problems and is well suited for media files.

I want to ask you to consider licensing as {{CC0-self}} Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Example separation.png ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Geozeisig}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


MMSI für Virtual AtoN

Hallo, Sie haben neulich diese Seite geändert: Tag:seamark:type=virtual_aton. Die Seite schlägt jetzt vor, dass wir seamark:radio_station:mmsi=* anstatt von seamark:virtual_aton:mmsi=* benutzen sollen. Das sieht komisch aus, gibt es einen grund warum dieser Fall anders ist als alle anderen seamark tags?

Das muss ein Fehler gewesen sein. Ich hab es korrigiert. --geozeisig (talk) 06:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Have you received this ping?

Have you received https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Proposed_features/Add_Translate_extension_to_Wiki&diff=2309658&oldid=2309630 ping as a notification? Asking as I remember some limits of people who can be notified per ping and I am not sure has it worked Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Raa se.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Geozeisig}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, May}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)