User talk:Geri-oc
Cheat Sheet für Dachformen
Hallo Geri-oc,
erst einmal vielen Dank für deine Mühe, die Tags in einem Blatt zusammen zu fassen. Ich habe trotzdem mal einen kleinen Hinweis angehängt, dass wir mit den 3D tags zur Zeit noch ein ziemliches Wirrwar haben. Wir wollen das beim 2nd_3D_Workshop_Garching verbessern, vielleicht hast du ja Lust? --!i! 
18:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Matthias, Danke - habe dir bereits per PN geantwortet - Gerd
Wikimedia Commons Bildanzeige im OSM-Wiki
Allgemein: Jede Datei von Wikimedia commons kann hier im Wiki so eingezeigt werden, wie die Datei File:Lutherlinde.JPG aktuell angezeigt wird. -> Eigentlich (sinnlos)
Nein, den nur durch diese Technik können Bilder von WM-Commons auf OSM-Wikiseiten angezeigt werden, ohne dass diese Bilder in unserem Wiki gespeichert sind. Vgl. Historische Objekte von Lutz. Die vielen Beispielbilder sind fast alle nicht im OSM-Wiki gespeichert. Dank der o.g. Technik ist es aber möglich diese Bilder im OSM-Wiki direkt zu betrachten. --Reneman (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
OSM-Wiki-Bilder für Wikimedia Commons
Hallo Geri, ich bin so frei und fange mal eine Liste mit Bildern von dir an, über die ich so stolpere ;-) Wenn du Lust und Zeit hast, würde ich mich sehr freuen, wenn du dich der Liste nach und nach annimmst. Ergänze bitte bei den Bildern zum Schluß die Vorlage {{d|Begründung}}. Danke :) --Reneman (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
OK - habe schon per Mail geantwortet (werde diese nach und nach zu COMMONS hochladen).--Geri-oc (talk) 07:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hallo Gerd, habe soeben eine Auswertung erhalten, darunter sind noch einige Bilder die nicht von dir sind, die werde ich noch aussortieren: --Reneman (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
349008411
349008411 File:Wlan.jpg User:Alban29350
29350 File:Via-Julia.jpg User:Kaeru2173316 2173316 File:Cycleroute-M-Wasserweg.svg User:ToniE
* 176195378
176195378 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Böhm's_Wiese_an_den_Parksälen.jpg
* 126979233 126979233 File:Malter_Wasserspielplatz.jpg
* 158213753 158213753 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplatz_Niederpöbel_1.jpg
1972343666 1972343666 File:Historischer_Grenzstein_Dippoldiswalde_13.JPG
* 138430735 138430735 File:Ulberndorf_Spielplatz.jpg
323812214 323812214 File:Natural=Rock_as_Pointfeature_and_Areafeature.jpg User:Netzwolf112770313 112770313 File:Gazebodk.jpg User:T99
1748827708 1748827708 File:Obermalter_Wegsäule.jpg
1487556475 1487556475 File:IMGP3595.JPG User:ZCC1471178711 1471178711 File:IMGP3454.JPG User:ZCC1289332499 1289332499 File:IMGP2816.JPG User:ZCC
1972343618 1972343618 File:Historischer_Grenzstein_Dippoldiswalde_15.JPG
* 132071452 132071452 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Am_Sportpark.jpg
1972343642 1972343642 File:Grenzstein_am_Steinbruch_Dippoldiswalde.JPG
* 132071461 132071461 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Nicolai-Ostrowski_Straße.jpg
* 168293287 168293287 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Am_Heideweg.jpg
* 108565153 108565153 File:Obercarsdorf_Spielplatz_Siedlung_neu.jpg
* 126675052 126675052 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Wolframsdorfer_Straße.jpg
* 71157016 71157016 File:Paulsdorf_Spielplatz_Am_Mühlfeld.jpg
* 128728341 128728341 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplatz_Niederpöbel_2.jpg
* 175607286 175607286 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Am_Firstenweg.jpg
395219678 395219678 File:IMGP0521.JPG User:ZCC
* 132928743 132928743 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplatz_Brandweg.jpg
99278873 99278873 File:Theatert.jpg User:T99
- 127044134 127044134 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplätze.jpg
* 128728309 128728309 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplatz_Wahlsmühle.jpg
1043983456 1043983456 File:IMGP4037s.jpg User:ZCC
* 176764930 176764930 File:Dippoldiswalde_Spielplatz_Goethestraße.jpg
1746350051 1746350051 File:IMGP39491.JPG User:ZCC
495995971 495995971 File:1200_Wolfssäule_Malter.jpg
1506143475 1506143475 File:Alter_Stollen.jpg
1746891540 1746891540 File:B_Grenzsteine.jpg
1747381612 1747381612 File:B_Grenzsteine.jpg
1746891537 1746891537 File:B_Grenzsteine.jpg
1744425097 1744425097 File:Bergbau.jpg
24867999 24867999 File:Bergkirche_Tharandt.jpg (Nur Update des OSM-Objektes erforderlich, oder?)
2026796365 2026796365 File:Betsäule_Marktgasse_Dippoldiswalde.jpg
2026796359 2026796359 File:Betsäule_Pfarramt_Dippoldiswalde.jpg
27835651 27835651 File:Cotta-Bau_Tharandt.jpg
2012754280 2012754280 File:Denkmal_Hochwasser_Tharandt.jpg
1661058139 1661058139 File:Erstes_Schulhaus_Braunsdorf.jpg
27808576 27808576 File:Forsthochschule_Tharandt.jpg
1832890439 1832890439 File:Gedenkstein_Kalkwerk_Braunsdorf.jpg
2183269443 2183269443 File:Gedenktafel_in_Grumbach_für_Gefallene_im_deutsch-französischer_Krieg.jpg
1662607055 1662607055 File:Grenzstein_29d.jpg
1371394760 1371394760 File:Grenzstein_Malter_Privatweg.jpg
1937997060 1937997060 File:Grenzstein_Obstfluß_1.jpg
1937997084 1937997084 File:Grenzstein_Obstfluß_2.jpg
1711467025 1711467025 File:Grenzstein_Poststraße.jpg
1563759591 1563759591 File:Grenzstein_Sauwiese.jpg
448233175 448233175 File:Grenzstein_Tännelsborn.jpg
2013510660 2013510660 File:K_Bäume_der_Jahre_Tharandt.jpg
1765884886 1765884886 File:Kalkofen.jpg
31740786 31740786 File:Kirche_Srbice.jpg
2183315716 2183315716 File:Mühlenstein_in_Freital_Hainsberg.jpg (Nur Update des OSM-Objektes erforderlich, oder?)
1604997996 1604997996 File:Mastnummer.jpg
1864324828 1864324828 File:Meilenstein_Dippoldiswalde_Elend.jpg
1509929159 1509929159 File:O2-Mast_Naundorf.JPG
2147921731 2147921731 File:Oberfrauendorf.jpg
1760702849 1760702849 File:Oberhäslich_Grenzstein.jpg
1802542999 1802542999 File:Oberhäslich_Steinkreuz.jpg
137717568 137717568 File:Ottos_Eck_-_alter_Turm.JPG
1776912984 1776912984 File:Postmeilensäule_Dipps.jpg
1811406417 1811406417 File:Rammenau_Grenzstein_1.jpg
1691885519 1691885519 File:Hirschturm bei Schmiedeberg Naundorf mit Blick auf Schmiedeberg.jpg
* 127949100 127949100 File:Schmiedeberg_Spielplatz_Bauvereinarena.jpg
1509929307 1509929307 File:Schriftstein.JPG
1509929289 1509929289 File:Schriftstein_(2).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1224021838 1224021838 File:Stollen_Naundorfer_Brücke.jpg
1794609346 1794609346 File:Stundenstein_Heideweg.jpg
2013871441 2013871441 File:Tafel_Hochwasser_1.jpg
2013871432 2013871432 File:Tafel_Hochwasser_2.jpg
2013871424 2013871424 File:Tafel_Hochwasser_3.jpg
1846977735 1846977735 File:Vermessungssäulen_Malter.jpg
1846977801 1846977801 File:Vermessungssäulen_Malter.jpg
1509929459 1509929459 File:Wanderkarte.JPG
1342135532 1342135532 File:Wegsäule_Dippoldiswalde_Plattenweg.jpg
1766235146 1766235146 File:Wegsäule_Dippoldiswalde_Rabenauer_Straße.jpg
1591274337 1591274337 File:Ladeira-velha.jpg User:Fullbanner1591274371 1591274371 File:Parque-merendas.jpg User:Fullbanner1591274282 1591274282 File:Francisco-lacerda-mark.jpg User:Fullbanner1743112798 1743112798 File:0030.png User:BR Vessertal
2008750492 2008750492 File:Grenzstein_1_Tharandt_Kirchsteig.JPG
2008750493 2008750493 File:Grenzstein_2_Tharandt_Kirchsteig.JPG
Als Markierungshilfsmittel kannst du gerne die Vorlage {{done}} verwenden. Die durchgestrichenen werde ich selber abarbeiten :) --Reneman (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
KURSIV - lasse ich erst einmal bei OSM - die anderen nach und nach - --Geri-oc (talk) 09:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Tag village in Schmiedewalde
Hallo Geri-oc, bin gerade beim rendern der Karten mit mkgmap über den Tag Place-village gestolpert, den Du bei N 51,06183. E 13,4773 für gesamt 2 Häuser gesetzt hast. Das ist nicht richtig. place=village soll für settlements von 2000 bis 10000 Einwohner verwendet werden. Solche falsche Verwendung führt dazu, das die 2 Häuser als Ort gerendert werden, was Schwachsinn ist. Und noch was: OSM ist nicht Selbstzweck, sondern entstanden, um eine copyrightfreie Datenbasis zur Erstellung von Garminkarten zu haben. Das OSM mittlerweile gewachsen ist und nicht mehr nur für Garminkarten funktioniert, ist klar. Aber man sollte immer im Hintergrund bedenken, dass das vorrangige Ziel die Erstellung einer Karte ist, und da sind halt tags so zu verwenden, dass kein Mist rauskommt. Und place=village geht nunmal nicht für 2 Häuser. Der gesetzte tag landuse reicht vollkommen aus. village ist überflüssig. Will nicht in Deine Bearbeitungen reinpfuschen. Bitte ändere es selbst.
Ein weiteres Problem Deines Tagging's : Du hast bei N51,007 E13.564 den tag hamlet gesetzt ohne einen tag name= . Der tag umschliest genau 1 Haus +Nebengebäude. Dss ist für mich noch kein Weiler. Der tag ist irreführend. falls Du das unbedingt als Weiler taggen willst, dann muss er auch einen Namen bekommen. ! Siehe bitte hier : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dhamlet. ein landuse -tag wäre besser gewesen.
mfg Drohne
- Hallo Drohne,
- 1. Erst einmal bitte ich dich mir eine Kontaktmöglichkeit mitzuteilen. Bist zwar als User mit 0 edits zu finden aber nicht ein Nachrichtenkanal ist angegeben.
- 2. Schöner wäre es die betreffenden node zu verlinken, bzw. die id=* zu nennen.
- 3. Unter der KO ist kein place= zum finden.
- 4. zu dem vermuteten 2. Problem habe ich einen CS-Kommentar hinterlassen (morgen1?)
- 5. OSM lebt von der Fehlerberichtigung - auch die eventuell User vor 4 Jahren gemacht haben.
- 6. Kommunikation im CS oder mit direkter id=* hilft meist immer.
- Gruß Gerd
pipeline
Du hast meine Änderung an key:pipeline als angeblich undiskutiert rückgängig gemacht. Der Tag Tag:pipeline=marker wurde per erfolgreichem Proposal durch Key:marker ersetzt. Wofür brauch es da eine gesonderte Diskussion? Discostu36 (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Auch über die Löschung eines Schlüssel oder Wertes sollte diskutiert werden. Ihr könnt mit eurer Stromgruppe in Frankreich nicht einfach jahrelang genutzte Schlüssel/Werte außer Kraft setzen. Ferner sollte eine Diskussion und eine Einführung eines Schlüssels/Wertes nicht in so einer kurzen Zeit (1 Monat für Diskussion und Abstimmung)) "durchgeprügelt" werden. Gab es deinerseit - als Zustimmer - einen Hinweis auf das Proposal/Diskussion im Forum? --Geri-oc (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hä? Ich gehöre nicht zu irgendeiner französischen Stromgruppe. Das Proposal wurde drei Monate lang diskutiert bis es zur Abstimmung. Ich gehöre nicht zu den Zustimmern. Und selbst wenn gehört es damit nicht zu meinen Aufgaben, es im Forum anzukündigen. Wenn dir das aktuelle Vorgehen, wie in OSM Tags etabliert werden, nicht gefällt, solltest du das an anderer Stelle ansprechen, aber nicht Änderungen reverten, die dir nicht gefallen. -- Discostu36 (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
licensing of image
Are you author of image https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:10422200_911666118844684_478749854764918653_n.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
Would you be OK with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement) ?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:CC-BY-SA-4.0 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Das Foto stammt von einer APP mit OSM Daten und sollte gelöscht werden, da sie nur zur Kommunikation mit notes auf OSM diente. --Geri-oc (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for reply! And I have one more similar question - are you author of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:2014_Altenberg_Fahrsilo_halb_gef%C3%BCllt.jpg ? If yes - are you willing to release it under some open license? Or is it also file that can be deleted as single use one? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Normalerweise sind alle Dateien von mir in WIKI OSM - CC0. Viele wurden von User Reneman zu Commons verschoben. Das kann mit diesen Dateien (alle - auch unter anderen CC als CC0) auch geschehen, da ich es nicht kann. Ich lade diese Datei noch einmal bei COMMONS: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2014_AltenbergFahrsilo_halb-gef%C3%BCllt.jpg --Geri-oc (talk) 09:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:2014 Altenberg Umspannwerk Trafo 102.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bitte einmal kontrollieren wo der Fehler in der Bearbeitung ist. Habe es von https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2014_AltenbergFahrsilo_halb-gef%C3%BCllt.jpg&action=edit kopiert und geändert. PS Alle meine (geri-oc) Bilder sind Eigentum und {{CC0-self}} und können entsprechend korrigiert werden. --Geri-oc (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:2015 Schmiedeberg Saray und Gemüse.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Alle meine (geri-oc) Bilder selbst aufgenommen zur Dokumentation in OpenStreetMap und
- This media file was uploaded by author of the work and its copyright holder.
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
↑ This template should only be used on file pages.
und können entsprechend korrigiert werden. Bitte entscheidet es zukünftig selbst, da ich mit 73 Jahren auch gesundheitlich nicht mehr so belastbar bin. --Geri-oc (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)--
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:1-Hütte Hermsdorf Alter As Nord.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Geri-oc}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Attribution
Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.
You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.
Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.
Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.
Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.
If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}
For your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc
For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way.
Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution
For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}
- File:Grenzpunkt Granit klein.JPG
- File:Grenzpunkt Kunststein.JPG
- File:Grenzpunkt Plakette.JPG
- File:Grenzpunkt Sandstein.JPG
- File:Grenzstein Sandstein alt.JPG
- File:Grenzstein 203e.JPG
- File:Messpunkt.JPG
- File:Vermessungspunkt.JPG
- File:Ottos Eck - alter Turm.JPG
- File:Schriftstein.JPG
- File:Grenzstein Naundorf.JPG
- File:Grenzstein Naundorf (2).JPG
- File:Grenzstein Naundorf (3).JPG
- File:Grenzpunkt Platte.jpg
- File:Erdgas Schieberfeld.JPG
- File:Druckwasserstation.JPG
- File:Grenzstein OC 01.JPG
- File:Alter Grenzstein OC 02.JPG
- File:2014 Hisorisches Gebäude Ruine Römerschacht in Altenberg.jpg
- File:Gartenglück Wegendorf.jpg
- File:City-Haus-Bauhof Wegendorf.jpg
- File:Bäckerei Wegendorf.jpg
- File:Kunstgießerei Hann Wegendorf.jpg
- File:Kopie Wölb-Brücke Kesselsdorf Tafel.jpg
- File:2002 Obercarsdorf Klappermühle nach der Augustflut.jpg
- File:2015 Collage Goldner Reiter Dresden.jpg
- File:René Schön Bierkeller Pöbeltal.jpg
- File:1-Freital-Döhlen, town hall - d ShiftN.jpg
- File:Tännichtmühle Kleinopitz.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:2016 Radwege Freital Rad rot 4.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Geri-oc}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)