User talk:Santasa

OSM Carto rendering icons

Hi, I recognized your edits with icons for alleged OSM Carto rendering on Tag:tower:type=clock, Tag:historic=stećak and Tag:historic=stećak necropolis. As far as I can proof, these tags are not rendered with those icons for now. The parameter osmcarto-rendering= is only for the symbols (icons) actually used and displayed by the standard map tile layer OSM Carto. Thus it is not to provide icons of other map styles or to propose new icons. --Chris2map (talk) 18:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@Chris2map: Should I remove it or you already did it. I need to use another licencing template than. I apologize for the mistake(s).--Santasa (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Or do you think that it's worth of making proposal for Carto icon, and where such proposal should be made....--Santasa (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

I haven't changed anything yet. Thank you for your quick response! If you would correct it, I would be pleased. And yes, please don't use {{OSM Carto icon}} on the files, so they won't be categorized in Category:OSM Carto icons. Thanks!

I haven't made any icon suggestions for OSM Carto myself yet. You may consult OpenStreetMap Carto, Talk:OpenStreetMap Carto and github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues --Chris2map (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

To the fast, I think, you can present the icon suggestions on the respective talk pages of the tag pages. --Chris2map (talk) 19:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, of course, I will remove those, I had no idea, it seemed to me very convenient to get licence template and category in one with Carto, although it bothered me what Carto is anyway. So, thanks for the suggestion on icon proposal, I will use, than, TP of the corresponding tag pages. Hopefully it will catch someone's eye. (Of course, if you find them interesting, and have a spare time maybe you could offer little push on the proposal :-) .) Thanks.--Santasa (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Reverted revision 2608321 of Template:Highways

I reverted revision 2608321 of Template:Highways. Proposed tags are not appropriate for inclusion in that template and per your own words in Talk Page it is not a footway anyhow. Cheers. --Csomerville (talk) 20:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

amenity=spa

Hi, about this change: [1].
Looks like amenity=spa is deprecated, could you remove this tag from a list? —Grass-snake (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

But why is depreciated, it obviously is useful for tagging couple of map features: (1) "spa hotel"; (2) "spa resort" and even (3) "spa town" ? I mean, of course, I will remove it if really has to go but it is useful - I used it on several edits today.--Santasa (talk) 19:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)