User talk:Verdy p

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Archives ± : 2012 ; 2015 ; 2016 Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec ; 2017 Jan-May, Jun, Jul-Dec

About Wikiproject Brazil

Please, let discuss the template at Talk:WikiProject_Brazil. --vgeorge (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I replied there. So there was nothing wrong in what I (and others) did before you deleted a lot of useful info that just contained some partial translation (a poor decision when all was needed was to improve the few missing translations). As well you should have read the doc. Blind deletions do not help anyone. — Verdy_p (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Pt:Pará

Why did you revert all my changes in Pt:Pará? Besides the cosmetic changes (that you apparently had already accepted in the WikiProject Brazil), there was some text content in my editions that you also deleted.

Why don't you discuss first or contact the editors before deleting changes that you do not agree with? You don't seem to be a stakeholder in the mapping project to this location; why don't you let the local community decide how they want their project page, especially in their own language? –Virgilinojuca (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

This is not voluntary, I did not want to "revert" these changes, but there was no edit conflict at all when I edited it. Probably a server-side cache problem when editing which sent me the wrong version content. This was not event visible in the "view diffs" before saving. I'll restore these. This wiki has some sever problems with its caches since MediaWiki 1.28 causing uinexpected artefacts and many internal bugs (look above, but the server logs are also capturing lot of fatal errors when parsing pages, and unhandled exceptions caused by its non-working defered tasks and checks). — Verdy_p (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
This is corrected (I've checked the diffs). Sorry for this. — Verdy_p (talk) 13:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Featured Images

You fixed a typo in the Italian text with this edit of the template however the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Featured_images/Apr-Jun_2017 still shows the wrong text. Any idea how we can refresh it? Dforsi (talk)

The template you cite (Template:Featured_image_h3 used for the 3rd quarter) is not the one use for that is used for April-June (2nd quarter).
A fix is then needed for the similar template used for the 2nd quarter (same name, only the last digit for that quarter number is to be changed to Template:Featured_image_h2)
I passed time last month trying to fix more cirtical bugs affecting the current version of MediaWiki that has issues in its template cache and that was causing the calendar of events not working and "exploding" in its parser statistics. I found tricks to avoid such explosion, basically by using some shortcuts with less templates, and splitting one template in two parts: one for the header, another for the details for each week (so that they can show the translated descriptions). This was not easy to do because MediaWiki still has a problem tracking backward links such as the list of templates used in pages. And that bug is still not fixed, so I had to navigate through many pages and templates to see what was really recorded and looking at internal parser statistics to trace the resource usages for each one. I found the solution and fixed finally all the languages and the calendar is now working. Anyway I just resued the existing translations even if I fixed a few ones, I may have fogotten one Italian version. — Verdy_p (talk) 14:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Dforsi (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
You can translate a couple of sentences in the top box (the messages are swon in grey with a "translate" icon you can click to edit the template to add the missing translation. — Verdy_p (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Changing proposal pages

The page proposed features/Remove suffixed name-tags from wiki is a discussion page with a record of people commenting on how much they like a proposal to change documentation. Those comments were made about what Hakuch wrote, not about what you wrote. Please stop misrepresenting other people lile that. --Andrew (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding this, could you please read the proposal pages carefully, especially the part about discussing them on discussion pages? --Zverik (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

But you've publicized a tool that instructs people to change tagging practies that your tool declares as "errors" when they are not. You are attempting to rpopose something you studied only for your country (Russia) but your tool declares "errors" in other countries that have not endorsed at all your "proposal". Stop saying these are errors, they are not. Now people that foloow you are "fixing" things and breaking lot of existing usages, because your proposal is NOT a clarification of the existing approved model, but is deliberately deviating from it in incompatible ways that have not been approved at all.
You should have made this clear in your proposal where it was completely incompatible (notably the fast you want stations to be only nodes, this is competely false and not errors to have them as closed ways/relations). In fact you are just adding to the confusion (not jsut because of this badly written proposal page that ignores current practice, but also because of your online tool that wants to change everything in all countries). — Verdy_p (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
You make a lot of assumptions about me. It's like you've been standing behind my shoulder for the past three weeks and counting countries that I've studied. The rest I'll reply on the discussion page. If you want, we could connect on Skype or Telegram and discuss questionable points about the proposal — it looks more like a series of misunderstandings resulting from bad wording. --Zverik (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
"about me". No just about the proposal and the way it is already being deplyed and enforced by an external QA tool pretending there are errors when they are not! The model has changed in the proposal and you want people to use it according to the self-contradicting proposal and this also contradicts the approved model. This has nothing personal. Most of the "errors" toyr tool detect are in fact false positive every where except in your region of interest (Russia) where you've already applied your model without prior discussion. — Verdy_p (talk) 11:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for support

Hey Verdi,

thanks for supporting my first steps in this wiki greets Joooo (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)