NL talk:Overzicht Nederlandse Verkeersborden
Trafficsign NL:C6
Additional note, following the forum topics of the Dutch community regarding trafficsigns it was decided not to use "motorcar" but motor_vehicle=no & motorcycle=yes & moped=yes & mofa=yes as these represent more accurate explicit tagging of access. This also compares with traffic_sign=NL:C12, because of the used symbol.
To also counter confusion regarding the description of ["motorcar"] with the symbol "Sinnbild PKW".
What is used in the implementation of Dutch legislation for "personenauto" passenger car which is also the direct translation of "motorcar". Used at the parking trafficsign "NL:E8". RVV bijlage1.
Also the use of forward/backward is noted, because there are a lot of situations where there is a single sided trafficsign. And the resulting possible use. Being able to navigate from the other side to a location and back again. Ekris discussion.--AllroadsNL (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Some suggestions
First of all, you need always the code of the traffic sign key. I miss in some of them .Instead of tag only the tag=value, you have also to add the code of the traffic sign because you are mapping the traffic sign also, not only the situation of the way.Also always a traffic sign is a node, you can apply to the way , to a relation, to whatever you want the tags that explain you the traffic sign. But the traffic sign itself it is good to be mapped (for inventary purposes, for example)
I see this wiki is in construction but you are missing the most used values in OSM. I think these values are the first you would have to start to talk it.
But also I miss two important things: I don't see any direction tag at the traffic signs so I don't know to which direction the traffic sign applies (only if it is oneway=yes probably I would guess it - oh wait, there are traffic signs in opposite direction like NL:C2, so you have to specify the direction of every traffic sign to make no missinterpretation of that ). Also I don't see any tag for the side of the traffic sign, to make the render and the counter be correct. As you can see with Kendzi3D some traffic signs are repeated in each side of the road. I think you can't miss that tag. The approach I have chosen with traffic signs preset is :forward and :backward , and the side tag.It would be not the perfect solution...but it works.--yopaseopor 13:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Traffic sign G11a and G11b
These do not seem to be official RVV traffic signs (they are not listed in https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0004825/2023-07-01#Bijlage1), but some vendors online refer to them as G11a and G11b (G11a and G11b on informatiebord.nl and g11b on moravia.nl. The g11b one, I've seen used on the ground in Amersfoort (I think the version with a horizontal line, the informatiebord.nl version omits the line). These signs seem to be the Dutch equivalent of DE:240 and DE:241 commonly used in Germany.
Should this naming be documented on this page and adopted in OSM? And maybe copy the tagging from the German version (highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=designated, segregated=yes/no), but then adopted to the Dutch meaning of G11 (so with mofa=yes and moped=no added)? I've already applied this tagging to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257237033
--Matthijskooijman (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)