Organised Editing/Activities/Marked Fort William Wayfinding Network
Fort William walking & cycling wayfinding network
Adding the signed Fort William cycle wayfinding network to OSM as route relations over existing ways. Manual editing, one account, no import.
Organisation and contact
- Marked (Marked Wayfinding), markedwayfinding.com, for HITRANS, funded via Transport Scotland's People & Place Programme.
- Contact: mark.smith@orchy.co, or the forum thread, talk page or changeset comments.
Goals
Six colour-coded routes are signed on the ground in Fort William but are not in
OSM. This activity adds them as route=bicycle relations carrying the
refs, names and colours shown on the signs, and maps the fingerposts as
information=guidepost nodes.
Background
Installed July 2026: six colour-coded routes, roughly 20 miles, Corpach to Upper Achintore and Torlundy to Glen Nevis. Directional fingerposts at numbered junctions, coloured markers on lamp posts between them.
- HITRANS — Installation Begins on the Fort William Walking & Cycling Wayfinding System (24 July 2026)
- The Scotsman — Highland tourist mecca launches colour-coded bike network to boost cycling (26 July 2026)
Scope
In scope: route relations over existing ways, and guidepost nodes for the signs.
Out of scope: anything not signed on the ground (state=proposed); import
of geometry from any dataset; changes to way classification, access tags or
alignment.
Ways will be split where a route starts, ends or turns part-way along one. Splits only, no alignment or tag changes, noted in the changeset comment.
Timeframe
September 2026, about two weeks.
Data sources
The signage on the ground, surveyed by us. All changesets carry
source=survey. No Ordnance Survey, Google or other third-party data.
Tools
JOSM and iD. No bots, scripts or conflation tools.
Participants
| OSM account | Role | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| MarkSmithOrchy | Sole editor, surveyed the network | Marked |
No other accounts will edit under this hashtag.
Changeset identification
Hashtag #marked_fortwilliam, a link to this page, and
source=survey. Roughly one route per changeset.
Add Fort William wayfinding route [ref] as lcn relation, surveyed on the ground #marked_fortwilliam https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Marked_Fort_William_Wayfinding_Network
Tagging plan
Per route relation:
| Tag | Notes |
|---|---|
type=route |
|
route=bicycle |
|
network=lcn |
|
ref=* |
Short route reference, as on the signs |
name=* |
As on the signs |
colour=* |
Hex value matching the installed markers |
operator=* |
See open questions |
cycle_network=GB:Marked Fort William |
Proposed value, see open questions |
source=survey |
Per guidepost node: tourism=information, information=guidepost,
bicycle=yes.
Open questions
cycle_network:GB:Marked Fort Williamis a placeholder. It names the contractor rather than the place, and contains spaces.GB:Fort_William,GB:Highland:Fort_Williamor omitting the key may be better.operator: Marked (built it), HITRANS (owns the scheme) or The Highland Council (roads authority). We lean HITRANS.- Walking routes: cycle relations only for now. Are parallel
route=foot/network=lwnrelations wanted? - Colour:
colour=*hex, colour names, orosmc:symbol=*? - Guideposts: are several dozen nodes useful or clutter?
- Where these routes overlap existing
lcntags or relations, we will ask before changing anything we did not add.
Community consultation
OSM UK forum thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/organised-editing-new-fort-william-walking-cycling-wayfinding-network/146240
Raising issues
Changeset comments, the forum thread, this page's talk page, or an OSM note. We will reply within two working days while editing is ongoing, and will fix or revert anything wrong.
Reporting
On completion: dates, relation IDs, guidepost count, any tagging changed after feedback, and any issues raised. We will keep the relations in step with the signage as it changes, and will say so here if we stop.