User contributions for Jeisenbe

20 November 2022

• 19:5219:52, 20 November 2022 diff hist −1‎ Proposal talk:Utility facilities ‎ →‎It is not necessary or helpful to change industrial or street_cabinet
• 19:5219:52, 20 November 2022 diff hist −67‎ Proposal talk:Utility facilities ‎ →‎It is not necessary or helpful to change industrial= or street_cabinet: changed heading to be more consise
• 19:5119:51, 20 November 2022 diff hist +1,183‎ Proposal talk:Utility facilities ‎ →‎It is not necessary or helpful to change industrial= or street_cabinet - This proposal is not necessar or helpful and should be rejected: new section

5 November 2022

• 22:1222:12, 5 November 2022 diff hist +873‎ Proposal talk:Healthcare 1.1 ‎ →‎Reaction to oppose vote: : The proposal was 12 years ago, in that time the healthcare= tags have been adopted by some editor applications such as iD, yet the tags amenity=hospital, amenity=clinic, amenity=dentist, amenity=doctors etc remain more than twice as common as the healthcare= alternatives, and while there are many amenity= objects without healthcare= tags, there are very few healthcare= objects without an amenity tag. Mappers have clearly chosen to keep using the de facto tags, wh
• 21:2721:27, 5 November 2022 diff hist +105‎ Proposal:Healthcare 1.1 ‎ typo ... and re-tagging millions of objects while re-writing many applications would have a clear negative cost
• 21:2521:25, 5 November 2022 diff hist +552‎ Proposal:Healthcare 1.1 ‎ {{vote|no}} The tags amenity=hospital, amenity=clinic and amenity=dentist are extremely well established and used by all kids of maps and applications of Openstreetmap data. These features are also clearly amenities: they are an important service that you want to have nearby in your town, and all residents and visitors will need to know the location of the closest hospital or dentist to get medical services. There is no benefit to changing to a different key. --~~~~

30 October 2022

• 19:5219:52, 30 October 2022 diff hist +672‎ Proposal:Key:pedagogy ‎ →‎Voting: {{vote|no}} No: Hybrid, mainstream, media are confusing and poorly defined values. Needs more consultations with global community --~~~~

23 October 2022

• 07:5207:52, 23 October 2022 diff hist +29‎ Tag:amenity=boat storage ‎ seeAlso= * {{tag|waterway|boatyard}}
• 07:5207:52, 23 October 2022 diff hist +40‎ Tag:amenity=boat storage ‎ * {{tag|waterway|boatyard}} similar tag

11 October 2022

• 06:3506:35, 11 October 2022 diff hist −20‎ Key:training ‎ →‎Common values: Make links editable
• 06:3106:31, 11 October 2022 diff hist −26‎ Tag:amenity=training ‎ →‎See also: Remove *{{Tag|education|courses}} - not clear how this is used
• 06:2906:29, 11 October 2022 diff hist −119‎ Tag:amenity=training ‎ →‎Possible synonyms: -> changed to “See also” - these other tags are not less valid.
• 06:2706:27, 11 October 2022 diff hist +336‎ Proposal:Training ‎ →‎Voting: {{vote|no}} The different types of "school" or "training" locations listed are quite different from each other and deserve to be top-level feature tags. Deprecating large numbers of tags is a large amount of work for no clear benefit in this case. --~~~~
• 06:0206:02, 11 October 2022 diff hist +271‎ Proposal:Refine departures board tagging ‎ {{vote|no}} I do not approve of changing {{tag|departures_board|timetable}} and {{tag|departures_board|delay}} to {{tag|departures_board|analog}}. This is unnecessary and less clear. --~~~~

9 October 2022

• 20:4020:40, 9 October 2022 diff hist +214‎ Talk:Proposal process ‎ →‎Remove "Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page"
• 20:3620:36, 9 October 2022 diff hist +309‎ Talk:Proposal process ‎ →‎Remove "Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page"
• 20:2320:23, 9 October 2022 diff hist +614‎ Talk:Proposal process ‎ →‎Remove "Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page"
• 20:2020:20, 9 October 2022 diff hist +646‎ Talk:Proposal process ‎ →‎Remove "Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page": I believe the text "Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page" was added a long time ago, because originally discussion was done on the proposal page itself, at the bottom, below the text of the proposal, the "comments" section. Moving the discussion to a separate "Talk" page was a clear improvement at that time (>12 years ago). But now this text is confusing because it suggests that is the correct place for discussion.
• 20:0920:09, 9 October 2022 diff hist +87‎ Proposal talk:Move proposal voting from wiki to the new forum ‎ →‎Proposals are about wiki documentation, therefore should be on the wiki
• 20:0920:09, 9 October 2022 diff hist +835‎ Proposal talk:Move proposal voting from wiki to the new forum ‎ →‎Decisions on Openstreetmap are made by consensus, not by voting: new section
• 20:0520:05, 9 October 2022 diff hist +806‎ Proposal talk:Move proposal voting from wiki to the new forum ‎ →‎Proposals are about wiki documentation, therefore should be on the wiki: new section
• 19:4519:45, 9 October 2022 diff hist +868‎ Proposal:Require proposal announcements to be made on the new forum instead of the mailing list ‎ →‎Voting: {{vote|no}} While I would support announcing the proposals in the new forum, there are a few problems: 1) It is unreasonable to stop use of the mailing list before the forum is even tried. 2) Not everyone wants to discuss proposals on the wiki, some seem to prefer the mailing list, and they should be allowed to continue discussion there. 3) The proposal also is not clear where new announcements should be made, it is said that it could be in the forum "[https://community.openstreetma

4 October 2022

• 18:2518:25, 4 October 2022 diff hist +125‎ File:Mangrove-species.jpg ‎ source https://pixabay.com/photos/mangrove-species-aerial-roots-254419/ - Free for commercial use, No attribution required
• 18:2018:20, 4 October 2022 diff hist +18‎ File:Pangkalan ojek Sinakma.jpg ‎ Add {{User|Jeisenbe}} current Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 18:1918:19, 4 October 2022 diff hist −22‎ File:Pangkalan ojek Sinakma.jpg ‎ Added attribution - I took this photo - CC0

15 June 2022

• 01:3801:38, 15 June 2022 diff hist +108‎ File:Salt Marsh tidal channels.jpg ‎ Source: https://pixabay.com/photos/salt-marsh-cape-cod-ocean-2763723/ (free for commerical use, no attribution required - https://pixabay.com/service/license/)

13 June 2022

• 17:5917:59, 13 June 2022 diff hist +478‎ N Talk:Tag:aeroway=aircraft crossing ‎ →‎Mention highway=traffic_signals and barrier= tags: new section

10 June 2022

• 17:2617:26, 10 June 2022 diff hist +1,455‎ N Proposal talk:Exit ‎ →‎Redefines current use of exit=yes: new section
• 17:2217:22, 10 June 2022 diff hist +25‎ Key:exit ‎ The key {{Tag|exit}} is mostly used together with {{Tag|entrance|staircase}} (83%) or {{Tag|entrance|yes}} (12%), mostly in Belarus (72%) as of June 2022 - see https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/belarus/keys/exit and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/exit=yes#combinations Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 17:1617:16, 10 June 2022 diff hist +131‎ Key:exit ‎ The key {{Tag|exit}} is mostly used together with {{Tag|entrance|staircase}} (83%) or {{Tag|entrance|yes}} (12%) as of June 2022 Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 16:5416:54, 10 June 2022 diff hist +1,772‎ Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette Guidelines ‎ →‎Doxing: (Posting (or threatening to post) information that could identify another person): new section
• 16:3316:33, 10 June 2022 diff hist −9‎ Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette Guidelines ‎ →‎Edit shaming: formatting
• 16:3216:32, 10 June 2022 diff hist +1,109‎ Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette Guidelines ‎ →‎Edit shaming: ::It turns out I was completely wrong. According apm-wa in a [https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-June/087594.html discussion on the OSM-Talk mailing list]: ''"Edit shaming" is any effort to humiliate or discourage a member of the OSM community from expressing a viewpoint ... due to said member's relatively low number of edits of the OSM geospatial database ...

9 June 2022

• 17:0817:08, 9 June 2022 diff hist +930‎ Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette Guidelines ‎ →‎Edit shaming: :I agree this is not well defined. When I saw that term in the guidelines today, I did not recognize it, I searched for <"edit shaming" + define> on Google, and found this page as the third hit, and the fourth hit is from the OSMF board meeting about this document. The first two hits do not actually contain the phrase "edit shaming". The fifth search result for that search, and the first hit for the phrase "edit shaming" is https://medium.com/the-coffeelicious/stop-edit-shamin

7 June 2022

• 22:0822:08, 7 June 2022 diff hist +135‎ Key:disc golf ‎ * {{Tag|disc_golf|hole}} - way along the standard playing path from tee area to basket. * {{Tag|disc_golf|tee}} - Starting point of a disc golf hole * {{Tag|disc_golf|basket}} - Ending point of a disc golf hole Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 22:0722:07, 7 June 2022 diff hist −4‎ Tag:disc golf=hole ‎ Remove “virtual” - all Openstreetmap ways are to some extent “virtual” representations of real-world features. Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 22:0522:05, 7 June 2022 diff hist +135‎ Tag:leisure=disc golf course ‎ * {{Tag|disc_golf|hole}} - way along the standard playing path from tee area to basket. * {{Tag|disc_golf|tee}} - Starting point of a disc golf hole * {{Tag|disc_golf|basket}} - Ending point of a disc golf hole Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 22:0222:02, 7 June 2022 diff hist +438‎ Tag:leisure=disc golf course ‎ Disc golf is a sport in which players throw a disc at a target; it is played using rules similar to golf, usually played on a course with 9 or 18 "holes". Players complete a hole by throwing a disc from a tee area toward a basket, throwing again from where the previous throw landed, until the disc lands in the basket. Most disc golf courses are built in semi-natural environments, such as the edges of a park or other recreation area. Tag: Visual edit: Switched

6 June 2022

• 03:4403:44, 6 June 2022 diff hist −139‎ Key:owner ‎ Remove suggestion that good external databases are a source of verifiable information. This is a misunderstanding of the concept on Openstreetmap. Change to say that this tag may not be reliable if only a govenrment database is the only source of information (no on the ground information or local knowledge)
• 03:4203:42, 6 June 2022 diff hist +1,915‎ Talk:Key:owner ‎ →‎Government land ownership databases are not acceptable as the only source of information for a tag in Openstreetmap: new section

5 June 2022

• 23:0323:03, 5 June 2022 diff hist +16‎ Tag:tourism=wilderness hut ‎ →‎Description: * Open to the public, usually '''Free rent''', but may require an overnight fee in some countries (for private accomodations see {{Tag|tourism|chalet}} instead) - current text was contradictory, discussion page says some require a fee but are generally open to public

24 April 2022

• 01:4401:44, 24 April 2022 diff hist +1,104‎ Proposal:Add Translate extension to Wiki ‎ {{vote|no}} I recommend that the proponents of this proposal create a test or sandbox version where we can try it out first. Right now I have no way of being certain how wel this extension will work, because I have not seen it at any other wiki site. But I are concerned that this will create more confusion and conflict between users from different languages and harm the development of vibrant communities in languages other than English. While I am a native English speaker, I recognize that it is
• 01:1101:11, 24 April 2022 diff hist +672‎ Proposal talk:ISCED 2011 Education Programme ‎ →‎Not verifiable on the ground: new section
• 01:0201:02, 24 April 2022 diff hist +1,262‎ Proposal talk:ISCED 2011 Education Programme ‎ →‎Don’t use numbers: :::: I did not read the whole standard because it is a [http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf 78 page PDF document], and I like mapping for OpenStreetMap, but do not enjoy reading long international standards. I did read what is proposed on this page, and it is confusing and not clear how mappers would use it in the real world. Since this is a proposal for mappers like myself to use when ma
• 00:4800:48, 24 April 2022 diff hist −10‎ Proposal talk:ISCED 2011 Education Programme ‎ →‎Don’t use numbers: Move down ":The proposal will use numbers only. Using words as values would still be possible by a follow-up proposal. --Skorbut (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)}}” - ignoring a concern is not “resolving” it
• 00:4100:41, 24 April 2022 diff hist +972‎ Talk:Tag:waterway=dock ‎ →‎Update description to include current usage: :: Are you claiming that the "how to map" section of this page has been wrong? There are established tags mentioned for dry docks and floating docks: "{{tag|dock|drydock}} - Usually a maintenance dock where ships can enter to do inspections and maintenance on the wet surface of the hull. {{tag|dock|floating}} - Floating docks are usually a large floating structure with the purpose to lift a vessel out of the water for maintenance or inspections o
• 00:3200:32, 24 April 2022 diff hist −10‎ Tag:man made=pier ‎ breakwater -> pier (probably copied from the other page accidentally)

17 April 2022

• 20:0120:01, 17 April 2022 diff hist +236‎ User talk:Jeisenbe ‎ →‎aerial imagery: : It looks like a screenshot from JOSM using one of the available imagery layers, but unfortunately I did not record which one was used at the time. --~~~~
• 20:0020:00, 17 April 2022 diff hist −7‎ waterway=dock (Q4732) ‎ ‎Changed [en] description: An enclosed area for ships or boats within which the height of the water can be managed. Tag: Data item terms
• 20:0020:00, 17 April 2022 diff hist −10‎ waterway=dock (Q4732) ‎ ‎Changed [en] description: An enclosed area for ships and other craft within which the height of the water can be managed. Tag: Data item terms