User talk:Hjart

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Residential

That is not a good idea, because a village contains more than residential. It contains also commercial, industrial and others. It makes sense, to use a area instead of a node, but using residential and name=<village_name> is no good idea. --MeastroGlanz (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Lots of hamlets & villages are pretty much all residential and in these cases it makes perfect sense to put landuse=residential, place=* & name on the same polygon. --Hjart (talk) 20:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Streets are a different landuse though. landuse=highway. As soon as you split the polygons into smaller ones to exclude the roads, you will also start noting more different landuses ;-) --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Signing comments on talk pages

Just in case you didn't know it: simply add --~~~~ after your comment to get a signature. --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I do know it. I've just been forgetting it a lot lately (in other wikis too). Sorry about that --Hjart (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

aerodrome extermination

I made initial run and found 478 cases. List is at https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8

Do you have plans for further actions or do you need help in contacting DWG? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Avråde at koble landuse-noder til highways

Hej Jeg så din ændring her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Multipolygon_Examples&type=revision&diff=1604324&oldid=1551764 I stykket hvor du ændrede står det:

Remark: the usage of highways (linear element) as boundaries (multipolygon or not) for landuse (area element) is basically discouraged. This because later shifting, nudging or reshaping the highway or area immediately results in the not often intended change of the connected area resp. highway.

Det er jeg meget enig i. Hele centrum i byen jeg bor i har landuse koblet til vejene og det er en pine at i JOSM forsøge at markere vejene. I iD er det meget nemmere, men der får man ikke fat i landuse-området overhovedet. Er dette et udbredt fenomen i DK? (Sundsvall, den nærmeste større sydlige by er mappet meget bedre af sendelbach)--PangoSE (talk) 08:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Jeg tilføjede teksten efter din "quote" :-). Jeg har i årevis aktivt skilt landuse fra vejnettet i DK + plus bedt andre om at undgå at lade områder dele noder med vejnettet, så det er meget begrænset hvad man nu om kan se af den slags i DK. Det er meget værre i Sverige og dele af Tyskland. Bemærk at du i JOSM kan bruge filtre (omend det kræver nogen øvelse) til at skjule f.eks. landuse på samme måde som i iD.--Hjart (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)