Proposal:Service=parking aisle
| The Feature Page for the approved proposal parking_aisle is located at Tag:service=parking_aisle |
| service=parking aisle | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Approved (active) |
| Proposed by: | nickvet419 |
| Tagging: | service=parking_aisle |
| Applies to: | linear |
| Definition: | Lanes within parking areas |
| Statistics: |
|
| Rendered as: | Road with width thinner than highway=service roads, Viewable at Only zoom=17 and 18 |
| Draft started: | |
| Proposed on: | 2008-07-27 |
| RFC start: | 2008-07-27 |
| Vote start: | 2008-08-04 |
| Vote end: | 2008-08-06 |
This Proposal is the result of voting results and alternate solution for Proposed features/parking aisle.
Summary
A parking_aisle is an area in a parking lot in between parking spaces so that vehicles can drive into and out of the spaces.
Although there is a amenity=parking tag available for parking areas, the amenity=parking tag does not show the layout of the parking lanes themselves. With the increasing use of aerial and satellite imagery in OSM it is now feasible to map out the layout along with entrance and exits of the parking area.
Reasoning
For Main roads in a parking area highway=service works fine as described in Parking, but for individual lanes they are too wide and clutter the area. Take this area for example http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.46965&lon=13.36844&zoom=16&layers=B00FT It looks decent at zoom=17,18, but when you zoom out to 14,15,16 the roads clutter together. That's why service=parking_aisle would not be viewable beyond zoom=17 (16 at most).
How to Map
|
To map parking_lane add the highway=service tag. Also, add the service=parking_aisle tag to it. Add a oneway=* tag if appropriate. |
Alternate tags
Example & Description
Width is thinner than highway=service roads.
Viewable at Only zoom=17 and 18.
Features/Pages affected
Comments
Please use the discussion page for comments.
See Also
Voting
I approve this proposal. seems reasonable and extensible --BearT 20:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)- I approve this proposal. Ivansanchez 20:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Grumly 20:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. Josias 21:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. Parking lots can be complex and it's useful to map their ways at this granularity. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 01:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --florianheer 03:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --EdoM (lets talk about it) 07:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I oppose this proposal. highway:service is enough. I can not extra value by creating a new tag. -- Aikon 06:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)- I oppose this proposal. I don't see why service roads on a parking should be (rendered) any different from other service roads. --Bwurst 07:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. Once again ,highway=service + lanes=number_of_lanes allready exist and are sufficient.--PhilippeP 07:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. I second PhilippeP opinion --Cbm 15:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Robx 07:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. highway=service is fine, plus lanes=number_of_lanes and oneway=yes as necessary --Sward 08:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. service is enough but I'm not opposed if someone want to add more info (and in the name of what if the tagging schema is following the consensus ?) --Pieren 09:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Hatzfeld 14:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. again, same as PhilippeP, no need for extra tag --Nik_Doof 16:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. again, same as PhilippeP, no need for extra tag --Amai 22:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal.This is a good way to distinguish bettween different types of service roads.--Nickvet419 02:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
This Proposal has been Approved by majority