Idea: use a chart?
I like how there is a direct Wikipedia definition link. I'm wondering if a chart could be made out of this information; so we can have a column for "key:fence_type" (showing the Wikipedia link) "Sample Rendering" (picture of a mapnik or rendering) "Description" (a brief description of what it is, (usually the 1st sentence of the Wikipedia definition)
--acrosscanadatrails 16:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Following a discussion on the German talk-de mailing list, we've compiled this list of ideas for fence attributes: Proposed features/Fence_attributes. Obviously there's significant overlap between the "fence types" section and the fence_type key. What's your opinion about the values suggested there? Would you agree to merging that proposal's values into the currently used fence_type key? --Tordanik 14:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Why not barrier_type? --Zverik 13:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Value "pole (wood)"
This value is really badly named, it contains a space and parentheses. Taginfo reports 13 uses only. According to Wikipedia, roundpole fences are very specific. I propose to use "roundpole" instead of "pole (wood)" (proposed here as well: Proposed_features/Fence_attributes). --Oligo 22:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with that - the value with parentheses is clearly a bad choice. --Tordanik 23:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Values "chain" and "hedge"
Unexpectedly, the "chain" link points to Wikipedia chain-link article. This is very confusing as barrier=chain already exists and refers to a single chain blocking the way. I propose to update the wiki to no longer use fence_type=chain, and instead use barrier=chain or barrier=fence + fence_type=chain_link. And add fence_type=chain_link in the table (also proposed here: Proposed_features/Fence_attributes).
- +1, another good find. Please update. :) --Tordanik 22:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
There are a few values on Proposed features/Fence attributes that could be integrated into this key. I would like to port the value "trellis_work", but I'm not sure whether it is correctly named. Google's image search brings up examples different from the distinct style depicted in the image, and I would like a value specifically for that style. It's a relatively common sight at least in Germany. Here is the short German Wikipedia article, it doesn't appear to have an English equivalent. --Tordanik 15:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Why is this key called "fence_type" instead of simply "fence"?
Look at our dobbelganger, the wall. We don't say wall_type=brick. We simply say wall=brick.
And look at highways. We don't say highway_type=path. We say highway=path.
I propose dropping the _type suffix.
Vinyl/synthetic/plastic fence type
Proposed addition of vinyl/synthetic/plastic fence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_fence — Which term is most common internationally? In the US, vinyl is most common in my experience. Cheers! —Todrobbins (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Material vs type
Concrete, wood and metal are materials, they should be added using the material=* tag, not using this type tag.
I am currently looking at a wall that is visually very similar to the second picture for "concrete", however it is made out of wood. This tagging doesn't work very well.
I added a new value "corrugated metal". At the forum, no one spoke against: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60212
First, the image does not have any wires in it. All steel in the fence is in the form of solid bars and posts. The image is also misnamed. There is no mesh in the image. The bars are parallel (vertical, to discourage climbing). Okay, there are a few horizontal bars too, apparently for structural support and decoration (and easier climbing). A wire mesh is totally different -- generally a synonym for either fence_type=chain_link or chicken wire and not welded.
Second, the definition has some words related to electricity but they don't really form a meaningful sentence. Could the author please elaborate the intended meaning?