From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Available languages — Landcover
Afrikaans Alemannisch aragonés asturianu azərbaycanca Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Melayu Bân-lâm-gú Basa Jawa Baso Minangkabau bosanski brezhoneg català čeština dansk Deutsch eesti English español Esperanto estremeñu euskara français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig galego Hausa hrvatski Igbo interlingua Interlingue isiXhosa isiZulu íslenska italiano Kiswahili Kreyòl ayisyen kréyòl gwadloupéyen kurdî latviešu Lëtzebuergesch lietuvių magyar Malagasy Malti Nederlands Nedersaksies norsk norsk nynorsk occitan Oromoo oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Plattdüütsch polski português română shqip slovenčina slovenščina Soomaaliga suomi svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Vahcuengh vèneto Wolof Yorùbá Zazaki српски / srpski беларуская български қазақша македонски монгол русский тоҷикӣ українська Ελληνικά Հայերեն ქართული नेपाली मराठी हिन्दी অসমীয়া বাংলা ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ગુજરાતી ଓଡ଼ିଆ தமிழ் తెలుగు ಕನ್ನಡ മലയാളം සිංහල ไทย မြန်မာဘာသာ ລາວ ភាសាខ្មែរ ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ አማርኛ 한국어 日本語 中文(简体)‎ 吴语 粵語 中文(繁體)‎ ייִדיש עברית اردو العربية پښتو سنڌي فارسی ދިވެހިބަސް

Transitional Procedures (until rendered properly).

Until Mapnik, at least, renders this key, what is the best practice for dealing with areas (like a central reservation tagged landuse=forest) that have been misdescribed to get a particular presentational effect? -- Hadw (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

To be clear, this Landcover page is not documenting a key called "landcover". It's a "Feature Page" documenting several tags/keys. So in relation to this page, there's nothing that Mapnik will be transitioning to
To answer your question about a reservation tagged landuse=forest : If it is not forest (not a tree covered area), then it should definitely not have the forest tag on it. Not sure what tag it should have. Maybe boundary=protected_area looped around the whole area, with the name set. Then I imagine within that area, you'd map the areas of forest, and areas of scrubland etc with different ways having different tags. If that gets really fiddly, and the area is mostly forest, then it's a reasonable thing for somebody slap on a landuse=forest tag around the whole area, and it would be reasonable for you to work on refining that at this stage. If there's little or no forest there, then that was a mistake which should be fixed. Be bold in setting the tag to something more correct, even if it doesn't render as nicely.
-- Harry Wood (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Cleanup request

Main discussion here Xxzme (talk) 04:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Missing taxonomy

Note that one more standard taxonomy here described could be considered for land cover

--Frankie (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

What is the point of describing here NLCD92 and LCCS?

I propose to delete these sections.

Suggestion prompted by

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)