Proposal:Aviation supplement

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aviation supplement
Proposal status: Draft (under way)
Proposed by: Noha307
Draft started: 2026-08-25

Although I have contributed to OpenStreetMap for over two years and a contributor to Wikipedia for over ten, I have never created an OSM proposal. So, my apologies if I have done something incorrectly.

Problem Statement

Proposal

Rationale

office=airline is not appropriate for fixed base operators. (i.e. maintenance, sales or airport services (e.g. fuel))

According to page 14-20 of the Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, "wind direction indicator" is the term used by the Federal Aviation Administration to collectively refer to "wind sock[s], tetrahedron[s], or wind tee[s]".

The layout of model aerodromes is different based on which type of aircraft control is being used. Control line aerodromes are circular, while radio control aerodromes are rectangular (i.e. they resemble miniature versions of full size runways).

The current naming scheme on OpenStreetMap for land-based devices that pilots use to navigate is confusing at best. There currently exists aeroway=navigationaid for visual devices and airmark=beacon for radio devices. Neither of these terms are self-evident that they refer to one category of device or the other. (e.g. radio beacons can be considered navigation aids and rotating beacons at airports are often referred to as beacons) Furthermore, it is not clear why beacon is a subcategory of airmark=* and not simply aeroway=*. Lastly, man_made=beacon, with its similar name, is a further source of potential confusion.

Tagging

To Do:

Examples

Impact on Data Consumers

Features/Pages affected

aeroway=navigationaid aeroway=windsock airmark=beacon

External discussions

Comments

Please comment on the discussion page.