Proposal talk:Service supplies proposal

Duplicate undiscussed

capacity=* has been used for occupancy:*=* Tag:telecom=distribution_point#Tagging
occupancy:*=* seems meaning how many connections are actively "occupied" and used. If service_supply=* has no other use possible, I would simply continue on it.
Furthermore, it should be prefixed power:*=* and telecom:*=* , as they apply to the power=pole and telecom=distribution_point features separately. They are namespaces that don't mix.
—— Kovposch (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Procedural order

Are you proposing line_management=service_supply alone on man_made=manhole and man_made=pipeline ? That's not comprehensive. It should be reviewed for applicability as a whole.
—— Kovposch (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

No this proposal doesn't combine man_made=manhole and line_management=service_supply. The last is intended on power lines supports and power cables particular nodes on which a branch for a service lateral occurs. It is intended at the same extent as current line_management=*. Fanfouer (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

What is A? Proposal:Service_supplies_proposal#Situational_sketch
—— Kovposch (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

That's indeed an error, thank you for noticing. Or at least an edge case I should solve. line_management=* is already applicable on pipeline's nodes, just like on underground power cable's nodes. man_made=manhole is an abstraction of underground chamber but I don't have tag for it. I think A should remain a simple line_management=* without man_made=*, would you agree? Fanfouer (talk) 10:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)