Proposal:More road details

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
More road details
Proposal status: Draft (under way)
Proposed by: Kovposch
Draft started: 2023-06-28

Proposal

More road types by adding to details without affecting existing tagging.

Rationale

Functional classification

Parts differentiation

  • side_road=* is confusing (common word for any minor road intersecting a major road) and unclear against frontage_road=* , and the road can't be shown as having them explicitly
  • No tagging for local-express lanes, causing roles to be abused for freeform text
    • as lengthy as Role westbound_express_lanes relation 1248024 (other issues not discussed)
  • modifier=* exists for different derived numbered route=road . But branches in the same route=road can't be shown.

Layout

  • The counting of lanes=* is often unclear and debated, when there are obstructions (eg parking) or deviations (eg very wide or narrow road) causing discrepancy between number of lanes officially and practically

Greening layout

More street furniture

  • insulation=* has bad semantics on whether something is noise-insulating, or has noise insulation.
  • The side of noise protection isn't indicated.
  • No solution for wind barriers, only some uses for windbreaks. However, that term is specifically for farm fields. It is inappropriate for trees elsewhere.
  • No solution for headlight glare barriers.
  • No solution of transparency in barriers

Traffic control limitations

  • restriction=no_u_turn can't be applied to a section of a road that bans u-turn over the entire length. Can only be done at each junction, and for every section in between with same Role from + Role via + Role to member.

Parking for bus and truck


Tagging

Functional classification

Parts

Layout

Greening


Street furniture

Traffic control

Parking

Ref

Examples

Route parts

Turning restriction on length of road

Timed FIFO stack truck parking

Rendering

Features/Pages affected

External discussions

Others

Comments

Please comment on the discussion page.