Distinction among market, public_market and marketplace
In this thread you can see the distinction among them.
Numbered stalls in a market
Named sections of a market
Street that becomes a daily market closed to traffic
Let's say every morning from 06:00 to 14:00 a three block long stretch of Main St. becomes totally filled with sellers occupying every inch of pavement.
At all other times it is just a regular Main St. with the usual car traffic.
- For the market, this can be detailed with
amenity=marketplace opening_hours=Mo-Su,PH 06:00-14:00
- (or the actual opening hours).
- For the stretch of street with traffic closed, use Conditional restrictions such as:
highway=* motor_vehicle=yes motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su,PH 06:00-14:00)
- Thanks. I started with this, but I suppose it doesn't actually get rendered on the map. Jidanni (talk) 07:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- It does get rendered on the map, with an icon and the area extent at high zoom. --Althio (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would add also note=* to explain the situation to other mappers Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- the north half of the marketplace is the "dry goods division"
- the south half of the marketplace is the "wet goods division"
- That's a good question! If there were different buildings with different names, I would consider using separate amenity=marketplace features, but if it's all one big marketplace with different sections for meat, vegetables, hardware and so on, then we need a new tag for each section. There isn't a standard way to design a tag like this yet, but when I proposed mapping camp pitches within a campground, most people voted for using tourism=camp_pitch inside of a tourism=camp_site feature. So I would suggest amenity=market_section or something similar, mapped within a single amenity=marketplace feature. --Jeisenbe (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Relation allowed ?
Hi, the page says no relation, though market place is sometime tagged as a relation and they are rendered on osm-carto style, see example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10231438 Is there a good reason to forbid to use it as a relation ?--Florimondable (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- The object which is linked above, relation 10231438, is a multipolygon. These are considered to be a type of area, just like closed ways which are used to map areas. The attribute "onRelation = yes" is only used for other types of relations which are not areas, such as route relations. --Jeisenbe (talk) 11:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)