Key:crossing:markings

For the purposes of crossing:markings=*, 'markings' shall be those markings on the ground meant to draw attention to the area where pedestrians are to cross the road. The standard for these markings can vary from country to country, but are usually required to be the same colour as the other road markings, in high visibility white or yellow. This is most commonly done with paint or bright bricks.

Values

This tag is most commonly used in conjunction with crossing nodes (mainly highway=crossing but also e.g. railway=crossing when the crossing area is marked) and crossing ways (e.g. highway=footway + footway=crossing).

For the purposes of documentation and discussion, markings parallel to the crossed road should be referred to as 'bars' while markings orthogonal to the roadway should be referred to as 'lines'.

Key	Value	Diagram	Description	Example
crossing:markings	yes		An unspecified or unknown crossing marking. Can also be used in document any crossing marking which hasn't been documented.
crossing:markings	no		The absence of crossing markings at a crossing. Implied by crossing=unmarked. May be useful in combination with crossing=traffic_signals where there is no marking on the ground, but there is a pedestrian signal.
crossing:markings	surface		A crossing which is not differentiated by high visibility road markings, but only by a change in surface. Depending on the jurisdiction, this may or may not be considered a proper crossing. Additional details can be added with the established tags surface=* and surface:colour=*. crossing:markings=solid has been discussed to document crossing markings which are all high-vis paint for the width of the crossing, but it has been determined that this is too rare (and confusing to mappers) to merit a top level entry in the schema.	.
crossing:markings	lines		Lines on either side of the crossing (U.S.: "standard/transverse"; Canada: "twin parallel lines")
crossing:markings	lines:paired		Pairs of lines on either side of the crossing.
crossing:markings	dashes		Dashed lines on either side of the crossing. Used in some countries (such as Germany) at (nearly) all signalized crossings.
crossing:markings	dots		Dotted lines on either side of the crossing. The dots sometimes are reflectors slightly raised from the carriageway. (U.S.: "dashed")
crossing:markings	rainbow		This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. A crossing with rainbow colours, other than in zebra pattern or lines along the crossing.
crossing:markings	lines:rainbow		This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. Rainbow coloured lines along the crossing.
Zebra style crossings
crossing:markings	zebra		Regularly spaced bars along the length of the crossing. (Called "continental" in the United States.)
crossing:markings	zebra:double		The similar to zebra, but split in the middle. (U.S.: "triple-four")
crossing:markings	zebra:paired		Like a zebra crossing but skipping every third bar to avoid premature tire wear. (U.S.: "double-paired")
crossing:markings	zebra:bicolour		A zebra crossing with alternating colours. The colours can be tagged using crossing:markings:colour=*.
crossing:markings	zebra:rainbow		This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. A zebra crossing with rainbow colours.
Ladder style markings
crossing:markings	ladder		Lines perpendicular to the roadway along with bars parallel to the roadway.
crossing:markings	ladder:skewed		Two lines orthogonal to the direction of the roadway with diagonal bars connecting the two lines. Sometimes confusingly referred to as "zebra" in the United States.
crossing:markings	ladder:paired		Ladder-style markings with the bars paired together.
Pictogram crossing markings
crossing:markings	pictograms		Painted pictogram(s) of pedestrian and/or bicycle (with or without arrows)

More values may be documented as they are discovered or invented by governments.

More difficult cases

In the case of segregated crossings for pedestrians and cyclists, this can be tagged separately as cycleway:crossing:markings=* and footway:crossing:markings=*.

The color of the markings can be specified using the standard colour=* scheme (e.g. crossing:markings:colour=yellow).

Multiple values of crossing:markings=* can be separated by a semicolon to specify multiple patterns atop each other (see examples below).

Crossing with marking which change in the middle of the crossing

Although quite rare, if a crossing has markings which change within a single crossing, one can tag this most precisely by splitting the crossing way and tagging the individual segments with the appropriate value of crossing:markings=*. The highway=crossing node should still be tagged with the most prominent value for crossing:markings=* or simply crossing:markings=yes.

Examples

Example	Tagging
	The most accurate way to tag this would be highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled crossing:markings=zebra;dots crossing_ref=zebra However, simply tagging the markings as crossing:markings=zebra shouldn't be considered "wrong", simply a less detailed description. Note: Dots refers to the very small markings right besides the zebra bars. The more prominent dashed give-way-lines are a separate feature.
	A segregated foot and cycle crossing highway=crossing crossing=traffic_signals bicycle=yes segregated=yes footway:crossing:markings=zebra cycleway:crossing:markings=dots crossing:signals=yes
	A shared pedestrian and cyclist crossing highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled bicycle=yes segregated=no crossing:markings=zebra;dots
	highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled crossing:markings=zebra crossing:markings:colour=gold
	highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled crossing:markings=lines surface=paving_stones
	Artistic crosswalk highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled crossing:markings=lines:rainbow This crosswalk is painted in various colors, but it isn't a solid marking; the white lines are still required for it to be a legal crosswalk (in the US).

Where crossing:markings is not appropriate

Buffer markings

These markings act as a painted curb extension for pedestians, somewhat common in Germany.

crossing:buffer_marking=* was proposed to document this. See Berlin/Verkehrswende/Gehwege for more details (in German).

Look left/look right markings

These markings should not be included in crossing:markings=* as they serve a different role from a crossing markings.

No scheme has been proposed to document these (yet).

Software support

Editors

iD includes a preset with icons.

Routers

GraphHopper considers crossing:markings=yes to be synonymous with crossing=traffic_signals and crossing:markings=no crossing:signals=no to be synonymous with crossing=unmarked. [1]

Possible tagging mistakes

crossing:marking=*

More details at taginfo

• crossing:marking=*

If you know places with this tag, verify if it could be tagged with another tag.
Automated edits are strongly discouraged unless you really know what you are doing!

See also

• lane_markings=* - Specifies if a highway has painted markings to indicate the position of the lanes
• highway=crossing - The location of a designated street crossing for pedestrians, cyclists, or equestrians
• footway=crossing - Specifies that the footway is a road crossing
• osm-yolo-crossings - AI import tool for zebra crossings