- yes, good idea. there's lots of stuff dropped in the waterways tag, which is anything but Myfanwy 02:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, I can't follow the proposal. It says that waste_disposal is basically a bad name, bad then it proposes to use it in a different way?!? - Ulfl 03:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- It says that waste_disposal is a bad name for the current definition. The proposal is a) to make the definition fit the name, and b) to move it into the "amenity" namespace. Gerv 22:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- We should find a better tag name before going to a vote then. - Ulfl 22:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- The name is fine - it fits the new definition. Do you have an alternative? We could have rubbish_disposal, but rubbish is more a Britishism, or trash_disposal, but trash is an Americanism. waste_disposal seems the best compromise (although you could argue it's too general). Gerv 09:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- yes, good. Just a note local MDs (councils in Canada) often provide waste disposal facilities for motorhome visitors to dump/pump out their garbage/toilets. --Mungewell 18:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- First of all, I see little point in differing between water-bound waste and road-bound waste. Sometimes, you can just park/moor and dump, and sometimes you have to carry the toilet tank or trash bags to a dumping station. Also, I think we should differ between
- Brown liquids (whatever ends up in chemical toilets)
- Grey liquids (soapy water, like from showers and dish washing)
- Solids (paper, food scraps, glass bottles, tin cans, anything else)
and so on. Where I live, it's much easier to find a place to dispose of solids than brown liquids. Also, there are quite a few recycling stations that specialize in stuff like glass and/or metal. Actually, how is waste disposal different from recycling? It's not like it leaves the planet.
Proposal: Waste Disposal is just a form of Recycling. Some recycling stations are easily accessible from the road, some from the waterways, and some from both. It's all recycling, and it's accessible from road/water/both.
Is this discussion specific for the voting section below, or are they unrelated? waste disposal as a tag sounds natural for any kind of areas where you dispose of waste. Logictheo 19:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Trash / litter
I'd like to make a distinction between the small public trash collection bags (often with a very small opening only) where one would put a candy wrapper or a used handkerchief, and the ones with a larger opening where a plastic bags full of household trash can be disposed of. Any native care to comment, which would be better to add to the list: waste=litter for the small stuff or waste=household for the daily bags?
- I approve this proposal -- Gerv 19:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --PerroVerd 12:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --Ulfl 01:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal.--Walley 18:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --Mungewell 18:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Florianschmitt 21:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --DrMark 14:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Hawke 22:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Chrischan 21:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. This is recycling --Bjalf 02:28 1 June 2008 (CET)
which kind of waste
In harbours "waste disposal" is an important thing. Therefore we need a differentig key for waste, and for every value a different icon:
<tag k="waste" v="..."/>
where value can be:
- trash - (for trash/rubbish)
- excrement - (for excrement evacuation systems for boats)
- oil - (for motoroil, diesel and emulsions)
- chemical toilet - (for chemical toilets)
- grey water - (for soapy water, like from showers and dish washing)
--Markus 09:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Waste disposal organised for the city - not (specific) for boats/...
In the places that I lived there always was a public place where inhabitants could take the waste they want to get rid of immediatelly or that can not be left on the street to be taken by the garbage car. This waste is not only 'recycling' waste. To me this is a 'waste disposal' but the page indicates this is only for boats and caravaning? What to do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Le top (talk • contribs) 20:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the page says this is only for boater and caravaners, but those things are an emphasis in the current text for some reason. I agree this is odd.
- The photo clearly suggests a much more conventional large bin full of household waste. If this is included then this tag is going to crop up much more often, than just boating/caravanning contexts. Also it becomes more important to be clear about the distinction with amenity=waste_basket (But I think we can be clear. Those are for pedestrians on a street) -- Harry Wood 03:09, 16 June 2012 (BST)
Illegal waste disposal
- They should definitely not be tagged as amenity=waste_disposal. Maybe create a separate tag for illegal landuses (landuse=illegal?), where waste disposal can be a subtag, that way you can tag other forms of illegal landuse, such as squatted property, illegal graveyards, etc. --Skippern 11:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- If there is a permanent object (per OSM standard practice), and if the object is for household bags (per the tag definition), then yes, why not? Do you have a picture of something like you mean? Math1985 (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is a waste container on the bottom of garbage chute (for household bags) and a waste container for some dry recyclables (paper, plastic, metal). It is behind doors, accessible for residents and garbageman ( https://firstname.lastname@example.org,19.8855599,3a,43.8y,222.83h,86.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sV8NqSWeRRx0FZ_ffqdh-GQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en ). Some are standalone, for buildings without garbage chutes like houses, newer blocks of flats ( https://email@example.com,19.9413231,3a,75y,26.39h,81.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3gc8NsjBE1ba0XYHgQJvRw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en ). Images are also in https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/419#issuecomment-193321552 Example of place where I tagged this objects is at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ePU Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal&diff=prev&oldid=1157729 that added unclear "Mapping of inaccessible private bins is discouraged." - is it about private bins that are both inaccessible and invisible to public making their verification unreasonably hard?Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also, if one should not use this tag, even with access=private how private, verifiable waste collections points should be mapped? Because mass deletion is unlikely to be a good solution Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Dumpsters and large bins?
The current text says it is for medium-sized bins, which are apparently larger than a waste basket.
Does this include "dumpsters" (US English?), perhaps known as a "skip bin" in the UK: large metal bins that can fit many trash bags, designed to be lifted up by a special fork-lift-style device on a lorry.
They are often found at large offices, businesses, campsites and caravan sites? I'm guessing the answer is yes. In that case, I would like to change the description from "medium-size" to "large" --Jeisenbe (talk) 08:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)